Since there are no currently active contests, we have switched Climate CoLab to read-only mode.
Learn more at
Skip navigation

Please find below the judging results for your proposal.

Semi-Finalist Evaluation

Judges'' comments

The Climate CoLab adaptation contest team appreciates the time that you took to submit this proposal. You’ve done a lot of background research and a good analysis, but there is room for improvement on the ‘plan on work’ and value proposition components of your proposal. There are many existing attempts like this, some of which have been successful. You could strengthen your proposal by conducting an analysis of why some are not successful and providing an argument for how to address those shortcomings. There remain a lot of questions around why cross-contextual information sharing is key – provide a stronger justification to the value-added here. Stronger justification is also required for the localities chosen, and how the documentary will create a setting in which differences in each localities can be discussed and worked out. Please provide clarity around the toolkit – what it contains, how it will be used and by whom, how it will build local capacity for collective risk management, and how it is different than what is already distributed worldwide by ICLEI. Finally, you may want to reconsider how you integrate and present the media training piece. All in all, this is a good starting point. The judges encourage you to consider these factors and keep evolving your idea. While your proposal is not advancing to the semi-finals this year, the contest team wishes you the best of luck in your endeavors and would love to see a proposal from you next year incorporating this feedback.

Share conversation: Share via:
No comments have been posted.