Since there are no currently active contests, we have switched Climate CoLab to read-only mode.
Learn more at https://climatecolab.org/page/readonly.
Skip navigation
9comments
Share conversation: Share via:

Clark Abt

Mar 20, 2014
10:20

Member


1 |
Share via:
Shifting behavior to accelerate climate change prevention by replacing carbon fuels by non-emitting renewables at competitive costs should concentrate first on shifting behavior in Chinese government ts and public. China is the major carbon emitter and plans to build 400 new cities of over 1 million inhabitants each in the next twenty years. These urbanized 400+ Chinese constitute the world's greatest potential for mitigating global warming in the next generation , provided they are housed in low or zero net energy green buildings, achievable with a combination of photovoltaic curtain walls supplying electricity, solar-thermal and geothermal heating, ground water cooling, and battery and third-generation nuclear base power supplementation at night. China is the world's leading producer of photovoltaic solar cells and could readily supply its own rapidly urbanizing market cost-competitively with "clean" coal or oil or gas socially priced to include their externalities of carbon emissions. Thus the problem of shifting behavior for mitigating and preventing disastrous climate change being created by continuing carbon emissions should first concentrate on replacing the largest potential carbon emissions from the massively pending Chinese urbanization drive with non-emitting renewables in which technology and cost-competitive production China already leads the world, and shifting the behavior of China governments and populace to demand and implement this. Prof. Clark C. Abt, Cambridge, MA

Stefan Pasti

Apr 6, 2014
10:45

Member


2 |
Share via:
Culture Change Needed for Effective Solutions to Global Warming (It’s not like mobilizing for war, but problem solving on a scale most of us have never known before means there is a lot of work to do.) Here are 6 passages from the “Long Version Table of Contents” (27 pages) for “Invitation Package for Possible Board of Advisors” (589 pages)[documents by this writer, for The Community Peacebuilding and Cultural Sustainability (CPCS) Initiative (at www.cpcsc.info)] . (These two documents can be accessed at http://cpcsc.info/invitation-package/ ). The passages are from a 28 point timeline of reports, articles, and other educational materials warning about Global Warming (1988-2013)(see pages 5-8 in the “Long Version Table of Contents”). The page numbers included with these passages refer to locations the “Invitation Package…” document, where there are more selections from that article, etc—and where the complete source reference citation is. My question to readers as they consider these passages: “What segments of communities, societies, and cultures around the world will NOT be affected by either an escalation of the climate change challenge, or effective resolutions to the climate change challenge?” My commentary on these passages is at the end of the 6 passages. f) “Avoiding the unprecedented threats posed by dangerous climate change will require an unparalleled collective exercise in international cooperation.” [“UN Human Development Report 2007/2008 Fighting Climate Change: Human Solidarity in a Divided World” (November 27, 2007)] m) “’The new reality,’ says Brown, ‘is that the world is only one poor harvest away from chaos. It is time to redefine security. The principal threats to our future are no longer armed aggression but instead climate change, population growth, water shortages, spreading hunger, and failing states. What we now need is a mobilization to reverse these trends on the scale and urgency of the U.S. mobilization for World War II.’” (“World on the Edge”—Lester R. Brown; January, 2011) u) “…the energy industry’s ability to boost production of oil, coal, and natural gas in North America is feeding a global surge in demand for these commodities, ensuring ever higher levels of carbon emissions. “ (article “World Energy Report 2012: The Good, The Bad, and The Really, Truly, Ugly” by Michael T. Klare; November 27, 2012) (p.293) w) “…we are still perfectly on track for a temperature increase increase up to 5.3 degrees C” (9.5 FO)…” [video presentation “Redrawing the Energy-Climate Map” by Dr. Fatih Birol (Chief Economist, IEA); June 10, 2013] (p. 295) aa) “Achieving such a deep transformation of the energy, industrial, and agricultural systems over the next few decades will represent one of the greatest technical, organizational, and financing challenges that humanity has faced.” (“An Action Agenda for Sustainable Development: Report for the UN Secretary-General”; October 23, 2013) (p. 299) i) “The world is on the brink of the ‘largest bubble ever’ in finance, because of the undisclosed value of high-carbon assets on companies' balance sheets, and investment managers who fail to take account of the risks are failing in their fiduciary duty to shareholders and investors, Al Gore and his investment partner, David Blood, have said. (“Al Gore: world is on brink of 'carbon bubble': Gore and partner David Blood call on companies to 'do their fiduciary duty' and identify carbon risks in their portfolios” by Fiona Harvey; October 31, 2013) (p. 313) My commentary: Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions to manageable levels in time to neutralize the potential for negative feedback loops, and significantly diminish the possibilities of disastrous global warming, are not problems that will be solved by the experts while the rest of us are doing something else. Everyone will be affected by the decisions being made, so everyone should be invited to participate in the decision making process. And we should not lose sight of the fact that the culture change needed to put in place effective resolutions to global warming will require significant resolutions relating to many other critical challenges (see “A List of Ten Critical Challenges” by this writer). Widespread awareness that we are at a critical point in the evolution of life on Planet Earth has been slow in coming, because the evidence is not quite “coming through the mist as much as it should be.” But there is more than enough evidence. And the evidence will “come through the mist”. [One quick glance reference document to recommend: “Resources, Statistics, and Observations” (20 pages) (another document which summarizes the “Invitation Package for Possible Board of Advisors”). The “Resources..” document can be accessed at the webpage “Press Kit” at http://cpcsc.info/press-kit/ --see the “Introduction” to the Press Kit.] This writer believes we are going to need all the resources, knowledge, and skills each one of us has, and we are going to need to make the best efforts we can at working together, if we are going to succeed at resolving the challenges ahead of us. And thus, he believes there is an urgent need for proposals which integrate solutions being created in many different sectors of society into ways citizens can learn about possible solutions in Neighborhood Learning Centers, and “vote” on prioritizing challenges, and prioritizing solution action plans, in their communities and regions. If the goal is to resolve the unprecedented challenges ahead, then it would seem necessary to exponentially increase the number of actively engaged citizens—citizens who have a much more comprehensive sense of civic duty. It’s not like mobilizing for war, where there will be drill sergeants and basic training, but people should begin to realize: problem solving on a scale most of us have never known before means there is a lot of work to do. His proposal—“Tipping Point Action: Citizen Participation in Times of Unprecedented Challenges”—is in the Contest “Shifting Behavior for a Changing Climate”.

Ernesto Lozano

May 2, 2014
08:47

Member


3 |
Share via:
Saludos a Todos desde nuestra hermosa Republica Bolivariana de Venezuela definitivamente el esfuerzo realizado por la ONU para lograr realizar impacto global en la mejora de nuestra nave espacial llamada Tierra aun esta en proceso es necesario que haya mas politica de los Estado que hacemos convivencia en esta Nave Espacial Autosustentable pero que no entendemos que la estamos afectando en el presente y futuro y es necesaria crear la conciencia social desde la Infancia con la Educacion Familiar desde la organizacion basica social desde la vencidad hasta llegar a lo Academico como proceso inicial para air al Sector Productivo Mundial y generar conciencia de Responsabilidad Social Empresarial para que el mundo que se autodestruye que esta en nosotros el Cambio Y le enseño una Filosofia que practico es "Lo que nos Constante no es Importante porque la Unica Constante es el Cambio" Perdonen por escribir en mi lengua materna el Español

Ron Hart

May 4, 2014
03:58

Member


4 |
Share via:
We need to make Ecocide the fifth crime against peace under the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court. Before we address mitigation efforts, or perhaps at the same time, we have to stop those principally responsible for causing acts of ecocide whether they are hiding in transnational corporations or private businesses, national governments, or those individuals who deliberately finance ecocide. Such a law will redirect corporations to concentrating on producing goods that increase life-value. Dangerous industrial activities that endanger the climate will be reduced because of the supranational criminal sanctions that would flow from the Ecocide Act. The Ecocide Act will protect the climate and mandate remediation and mitigation efforts--all part of the sentencing process.

Alex Krotz

May 7, 2014
01:28

Catalyst


5 |
Share via:
There are three problems i see with the "Ecocide Act". First, laws are intended to be clear and distinct in defining what is legal and what is illegal, for example robbing a bank is illegal, but making a deposit is not. If we make an ecocide act, it cannot be distinct because everyday science learns new things and expands it's understanding of how the environment and our activities interact, so this law would have to be changed often. Second, the people who make these laws are not scientists, and even if they bring in scientists to consult them they would still have major political and economic biases against certain areas, i think it is well established how much politicians can be swayed by money. Third, the extent to which the law would have to go is immense, from chemical plants in India to arctic drilling it would be very difficult to enforce them, the goal is not just to punish those damaging the environment but to also prevent it. However i think if there were international regulations enforced strictly it would certainly help, im just not so sure about a single "Ecocide Act"

Tom Morris

May 7, 2014
10:22

Member


6 |
Share via:
Laws will not change attitude or behavior. Incentive and real alternatives will. in the case of China's growth if the Chinese feel it will benefit them to go green in the design of cities then they will. Ecocide laws are too broad and allow for abuse by politicians as alexkrotz pointed out in his post. Personal peeves do not make for good law.

Jan Kunnas

Jul 18, 2014
06:38

Member


7 |
Share via:
The most effective way to change the behavior in Chinese government and public is that we act ourselves. Inaction by other countries are the best excuse for the Chinese governments inaction. Regarding historical responsibility China is still trailing behind the US and the European Union. "Calculating the cumulative cost of carbon dioxide emissions provides us an opportunity to finally settle the question of historical responsibility for the damages caused by climate change. The choice of price has a big influence on the accumulated costs, but it does not affect the relative position of different countries. With both a constant price and a declining price the USA has the highest cumulative cost of carbon emissions during the period 1902—2009, contributing 24–27% of the cumulative global cost, followed by the EU with 17–19%. China is nowadays the biggest source of carbon dioxide, but the cumulative costs of its emissions are still long behind with 10–12%." http://newsroom.taylorandfrancisgroup.com/news/press-release/who-is-responsible-for-climate-change#.U8jtq5TK6Sq

James Sterritt

Jul 29, 2014
07:25

Member


8 |
Share via:
Two paths meet, urgency of action by Humans and the arrival of Jesus Christ in modern history teaching prayer and resolution around the principles of the law, offering the vehicle that institutionalizes the exact emotions called into play by the twins, the city and the Storm. We point to the power of the Cross, not to our human potential, and make the third obvious observation that events unfairly claim innocents. Demonstrating the morality of angels.

Jean-pierre Sancho

Sep 4, 2014
01:47

Member


9 |
Share via:
lol try a fossil fuel "ice bucket" challenge! funny viral messages would work best for starters...they don't cost much...