Path To Zero - Urban Resilience by BAS Nederland
Please find below the
Finalist Evaluation
Judges'' comments
Your proposal is a huge project. How would this small grant move the work forward?
Besides it, your proposal does not quite address climate resilience effectively, as separate from climate change mitigation.
A driving principle in this proposal is that competitiveness increases resilience. In the judges opinion this is not a meaningful definition of resilience.
Semi-Finalist Evaluation
Judges'' ratings
| • | Novelty: | |
| • | Feasibility: | |
| • | Impact: | |
| • | Presentation: |
Judges'' comments
Specific revisions requested:
1) Clearly and explicitly identify how this proposal relates to urban resilience. This contest is about adapting to a changing climate, not mitigating the causes of it.
2) Need to draw a specific link between energy independence and risks for specific cities - how will this help them be more resilient?
Judges comments:
"The proposal is well-written and compelling, but I'm not sure it meets the spirit of this particular competition."
0comments
Share conversation:
Share via:
No comments have been posted.
