Skip navigation
7comments
Share conversation: Share via:

Jennifer Perron

Oct 3, 2015
09:41

Member


1 |
Share via:

Dear Moses, 

Thank you for your proposal on spreading awareness of the emissions implications of meat consumption under the Global Climate Action Plan of MIT's Climate CoLab. I am one of the Fellows for this contest, here to serve as a liaison to the Colab, answer any questions you may have, and help provide substantive feedback to strengthen proposals. Fellows will also have a role in the evaluative portion of this contest.

You are off to a good start with your concept and description. Here are a few suggestions you could consider to strengthen your proposal: 

  • It may be useful to endeavor to describe the concrete steps, timeline, and actors that you would envision most effectively implementing the Meat Climate Change literacy concept. 
  • How would you envision quantifying the (emissions reductions) results of the educational program? 
  • As you know, this contest asks participants to draw from the various regional and national proposals in order to inform a global strategy. It may be helpful to select a wider diversity of proposals to combine to help support your proposal. Please take a look if new proposals have emerged in recent weeks that could work well with your concept. The next step will be to further detail how these various regional plans could be most effectively combined to enact a global meat consumption reduction campaign. 
  • Finally, please continue to fill out the remaining proposal sections on projected costs, timelines, pilot efforts, and emissions reductions potential.

 

Thank you once again for your contributions to the CoLab and look forward to seeing the completed product! 

Best, 

Jennifer 


Laur Hesse Fisher

Nov 3, 2015
03:53

Staff


2 |
Share via:

Having trouble finding regional plans to integrate into your Global Climate Action Plan?

We have added some “seed proposals” — national and regional plans that have already been proposed by governments or organizations around the world, that you can incorporate into your Global Climate Action Plan.

For example, now on the website are:

- the emission reduction commitments submitted by countries in advance of the UNFCCC's 2015 climate negotiations, known as the Intended Nationally Determined Contributions, or INDC’s; and

- scenarios through which countries around the world could reach significant carbon reductions, prepared by the Deep Decarbonization Pathways Project (DDPP).
The INDC’s and DDPP plans have been uploaded to the Regional Plan Workspace for the 6 major nations/regions: United States, European Union, India, China, Other Developed Countries and Other Developing countries.

If you would like to use any of these plans in your Global Climate Action Plan, you can select them under the proposal field, “Which plan did you select for…?”  They are located in the Regional Plan Workspace, under the titles: "Seed Proposal: Deep Decarbonization Pathways Project in…” and "Seed proposal: INDC submitted to 2015 UN climate negotiations by…”.  Feel free to link to them now; the content will be completed before your revision deadline.


Ulrich Knirsch

Nov 21, 2015
12:37

Member


3 |
Share via:

Here in Germany there was a proposal to introduce (not by law but by public awareness) a "meat free Thursday".  It received the predictable criticism "nobody tells me what to eat".  In fact though, we are not that far from implementation:  By (Christian) custom, many people do not eat meat on Fridays and thus most company canteens do not offer it then.  The alternative us usually vegetarian and/or fish.

In Sweden there is another custom, that is to eat a dish with pea soup on Thursday.  Nobody is forced to do it, but most do.  

Back to Germany, with the influx of refugees from Muslim countries, more and more places will have to offer options without pork.  Since there is also a (still small) market for vegetarian food, the trend will probably be to go in that direction.  

Furthermore the recent health studies on meat, as well as awareness of animal rights and water issues will help to transport this issue.  What is needed now is a smart ad campaign.


Vivian Price

Nov 30, 2015
11:24

Member


4 |
Share via:

Good to meet you, Moses. VisionLA'15 was better for having you as a participant.

Our exhibit is http://visionlafest.org/event/watts-now-visionla-15-at-the-wlcac/2015-12-01/

 


Michael Hayes

Dec 5, 2015
02:05

Member


5 |
Share via:

Dear Mosessite,

I've closely observed the CoLab operation for some time now and I am also the most active contributor. In the time I've spent doing such, I've seen this type of voting surge happen on a number of occasions. Also, I have good reason to believe (which I can not go into details here) that the CoLab team adheres to an extremely high ethical standard and should be trusted to do the right thing.

Please keep in mind, moreover, such accusations of misconduct should be directed, through private email, to the CoLab team before openly accusing others of serious misconduct. If fraud has happened, 1) there is no ruling out that a supporter of another proposal did the dirty deed simply to discredit the innocent team or 2) a supporter of the innocent team took it upon themselves to try to game the votes and please keep in mind that 3) a number of participants actually prefer to remain anonymous, through using a pseudonym, for various reasons.

Further, many proposal authors/supporters pay close attention to the timing of many aspects of the contest. Such as, not just last minute voting surges but also it is not unusual for an author to wait until the last few minutes before the submission deadline to post or edit their proposal simply so that their proposal gets posted at the top of the list. I've seen this type of maneuver happen many many times!

In brief, trust the CoLab team to walk the high road on these issues and give them time before openly and publicly insulting (and royally pissing off) many innocent fellow participants. Do you realize that the way you phrased your concern that you actually accused....ME....of wrong doing??? That does not make me a Happy Camper;))

To conclude, I ask that the CoLab team simply remove the comments associated with this public accusation of wrong doing as there is, at this time, no benefit to anyone by having such unsubstantiated and embarrassing comments as part of the permanent record. Mosessite's concerns are noted and will be properly reviewed and he should be allowed the benefit of rethinking what he actually wishes to be apart of....his....CoLab permanent history. 

One truly great service that the CoLab team offers is that they can and will 'Let You Take Your Comments Off The Record' and they have been kind enough to me to do such on multiple occasions when I, myself, very publicly insert both feet into my rather ignorant mouth.  

Warmest regards (from a profoundly honest man),

Michael


Moses Seenarine

Dec 5, 2015
10:26

Member


6 |
Share via:
Proposal
contributor

Instead of trying to mobilize more votes during the last two days for my proposal, I had to spend all my energies and effort documenting fraud. And, instead of gratitude, you want all the my investigation and analysis to be deleted?

I understand that vote surges occur at the end. But there are specifics to the intensity of this Moblize Now surge that still raises concerns. Given limited data, resources and time, I was only partially able to document some aspects of their fraudulent voting.

1) 66 votes in a 3-hour period at 2.7 minutes for vote, including 36 new members, is highly dubious

2) members with similar names and screen names, joining at the same time, is also improbable

That fact that these two issues may be part of sabotage makes them even more serious. They should be public, if only as a deterrent. Voting fraud need to be seriously addressed since they place the credibility of the program at stake. Moreover, it serves as a huge disincentive to others who play by the rules. 


Moses Seenarine

Dec 5, 2015
10:46

Member


7 |
Share via:
Proposal
contributor

A Final Note, from a recent article we published on OpEdNews

The climate change problem is largely due to over-consumption in the global North. And, intake of animal products is a huge part of the North's over-sized GHG footprint. The global South have a fraction of the footprint of the global North, and should focus on forcing developed countries to tax over-consumption. The global South have legal and moral standing, but the heated debates at the climate talks are not over how to stop or reverse global warming, that is, putting out the fire, but over injury compensation for future victims. Putting out the raging over-consumption fire in the global North would eliminate the South's need to fight for compensation.

Remarkably, the world's government leaders, and many climate groups, have omitted diet and over-consumption from the COP climate agenda. Also absent are the planet's two leading carbon sinks - soils and oceans. Reducing over-consumption and expanding carbon sinks is putting water on the climate change fire.

Livestock production is the leading cause of deforestation, but as countries file their climate change pledges, animal products will not be on the GHG reduction list. Neither will marine life. About 1% of the oceans' plankton dies annually from ocean acidification, which is mostly caused by high carbon pollution from industrial agribusiness.

Phytoplankton stocks have decreased by 40 percent since 1950. This astonishing collapse may have dramatic consequences both for the oceans and for humans. Two out of every three breaths we take come via phytoplankton. Phytoplankton absorbs a huge amounts of CO2 each year, so the disappearance of these microscopic organisms could further accelerate warming.

A 2015 Chatham House report found consumption of animal products is a major driver of climate change. And reducing global meat consumption will be critical to keeping global warming below the 'danger level' of two degrees Celsius, the main goal of Paris climate negotiations. Yet, diets and over-consumption taxes are not on the COP21 agenda.

Global meat consumption has already reached unhealthy levels, and is on the rise. In the global North, the average person is already eating twice as much meat as is deemed healthy by experts. Over-consumption is already contributing to the rise of obesity and non-communicable diseases like cancer and type-2 diabetes, and it is a growing problem. Alarmingly, global animal product consumption is set to rise by over 75 percent by 2050.

ADD YOUR COMMENT
You must be logged into your account to post a comment.
Click on the box