Since there are no currently active contests, we have switched Climate CoLab to read-only mode.
Learn more at https://climatecolab.org/page/readonly.
Skip navigation

Please find below the judging results for your proposal.

Finalist Evaluation

Judges'' ratings


Novelty:
Feasibility:
Impact:
Presentation:

Judges'' comments


Judges' comments are outlined below:

Judge 1: This is a very good proposal which incentivizes freight shippers to take a holistic perspective on their GHG emissions.

Judge 2: I concur with the authors that a transparent system of tracking emissions throughout the supply chain can significantly help improve environmental performance. However, the incentive for companies to participate (and pay for the service) remains unclear to me.

Judge 3: Having a system for estimating the full transportation impacts of a supply chain could be a powerful tool associated with a reliable offset program. At the same time, I think there are competitive platforms that should be at least discussed. I am a bit skeptical though on how this proposal actually works - the information on the mechanics are scant. I am also not a big fun of offset systems - they are notoriously difficult to run effectively. So my support for this proposal at its current development stage is a bit tentative as it does not provide a strong case on either front.

Judge 4: This is an interesting proposal. I would like to see more on the benefit to the user, and why shippers would be willing to spend the money to become part of the scheme. Is there enough incentive? This is dependent on the interest in knowing transportation emissions, which may vary by country. What kind of interest have you received from shippers?

Semi-Finalist Evaluation

Judges'' ratings


Novelty:
Feasibility:
Impact:
Presentation:

Judges'' comments


Judge 1:
This is an interesting idea. The proposal needs more details though, for example on what incentives are to be proposed that will get operators etc. to take part in the program, how much it would cost, and some level of quantification of environmental benefits.

2comments
Share conversation: Share via:

Bruno Passarelo

Oct 31, 2017
08:06

Member


1 |
Share via:
Proposal
creator

Dear judge,

We appreciate your comments and we added more information about our proposal following your suggestion.


- update: what incentives are to be proposed for users

- update: cost

- update: enviromental benefits

- update: introduction 

- about the amount of GHG emission reduction is not the first impact of our proposal, because VGP is a online platform to manage the GHG emission, thus, the VGP's users can act to reduce them. In other words, we only can reduce what we know and measure. Thereby, VGP will help their user to undestand their emission sources and share some ideas to reduce and/or offset them, everything online, secure and integrate. 


Bruno Passarelo

Jan 8, 2018
03:05

Member


2 |
Share via:
Proposal
creator

Dear judges, 

The monthly fee paid by members guarantees a standard level of server performance, updates about transport and logistics sector including fuel properties, and VGP administration services. However, the GHG offsetting is not include in the fee, because it is known that offsetting could be expensive for large amount of.

The benefits starts to understand the GHG emission by transport sector, actually, the main environmental impact. The increase of GHG emission into supply chain can mean inefficiency in transportation, thereby, VGP can help their members to look this situation with more details and subsidies to take decisions.

VGP can create environmental indicators among the supply chain, ranking them by GHG emission and environmental efficiency. Also, VGP make possible to create scenarios between different modes aiming aware the user about possible emission by their transport activities, and, then, preventing it. 

In Brazil, we presented VGP for some companies, which ones got interest due to online and security platform for a low cost and integrating with supply chain.