Since there are no currently active contests, we have switched Climate CoLab to read-only mode.
Learn more at https://climatecolab.org/page/readonly.
Skip navigation
6comments
Share conversation: Share via:

Doron Bracha

May 30, 2014
03:45

Member


1 |
Share via:
Interesting proposal, seems creative and original. But pumping sea water into the ground would compromise the fresh water aquifers: http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-17775211 In general, such an undertaking would consume a lot of energy, would inevitably disrupt the ecosystem, and the long term consequences may be serious. The other option, pumping sea water to the surface of the Sahara for evaporation, would also not really help, since all that water vapor would eventually turn into clouds which would rain down somewhere else... Yet I appreciate the idea, we need to keep thinking out of the box... Cheers !..

Khalid Md Bahauddin

Jun 1, 2014
04:32

Catalyst


2 |
Share via:
I would say, this is very generalized concept which will lead to ecological disasters. I think below matters will be considered before implementation of the project. 1. Did you assess the type and nature of aquifers? 2. You mentioned that it will increase vegetation, will it afforestation or reforestation? Can existing biodiversity even micro-biodiversity tolerate the salinity of sea water? 3. Seems it is an aristocrat project because of considering desalination methods, then you should do cost-benefit analysis. 4. How will you minimize the trans-boundary rivers conflicts among mentioned countries? 5. Every ecosystem has own balancing role for maintaining the the climate, mention what harmful matters Sahara Desert has that you think to reform the ecosystem, justify it clearly. Thank you Khalid Md. Bahauddin

Michelle Tigchelaar

Jun 11, 2014
07:42

Member


3 |
Share via:
I find it highly doubtful that any of your desirable outcomes will be met through this proposal. Firstly, the area of the Sahara is only 1% of the area of the World Oceans. That means that in order to reduce global sea level rise by 1mm/year, you would need to distribute 10cm/year of water over the entire Sahara, and keep it there (without it evaporating/flowing back into the ocean through groundwater and river systems). This is a lot of water. Secondly, we are dealing with salt water here, that - as noted above - provides a threat to freshwater aquifers and cannot directly be used for agricultural purposes. Desalination is a very costly procedure. Finally, the dynamical response of the climate system to a greening of the Saharan desert will be highly complex, and will be associated with large changes in climate and weather patterns on regional and possibly global scales. I believe that at this point in time it is not known what exactly this response would be, but directly linking it to a reduction in hurricane activity over the Atlantic Ocean is tricky at the least.

Sardar Mohazzam

Jun 18, 2014
07:47

Catalyst


4 |
Share via:
Hello - Your idea needs more development. Although, I have few apprehensions about your proposal. As I believe, desalination and water reclamation is very expensive recipe in terms of energy use. Also, the ecology of region needs better scientific understanding before proposing anything like what you are proposing. You have mentioned that these kind of things (like your proposal) are already happening. Can you quote few of them ? How they are working and what there objectives ? I will say keep improving your idea. We will see what it will be finally. Best

Sergio Pena

Jul 16, 2014
12:28

Catalyst


5 |
Share via:
An interesting idea. However, might be possible to have the political support of the countries in this part of the world? Be aware that to take for grantd the collaboration of these countries is not exactly a real assumption. To force the countries might create dangerous consecuences in term of legal consecuences.Thanks.

Marie Pollard

Jul 23, 2014
05:34

Member


6 |
Share via:
Proposal
contributor
I appreciate all of your in depth comments and am sorry I did not reply earlier but I was very busy. I value your input and it has opened my eyes in many ways. Particularly about the aquifers and also the news lately involving brine solutions pumped into the ground int he US linked to some earthquake activity. Truly this is a dangerous situation and is not suitable. To one person above who asked about other examples of vegetation in arid land I have only to note that Southern California was a desert before they landscaped to what it is now and even a substantial amount of water is needed to maintain it green. Of course they have their own problems with water supply. I still think there are plants suitable for growth in the desert that can be introduced without such detrimental consequences as was noted above. Regards,