There is a fault of strategic analysis and coordination for this and similar projects, specially gobal warming still don't have a plan.
Previously I presented the organization of a Global Project that will manage all this kind of risks explainign his organization and their main functions, like knowledge management, the improtance of history, etc.
But it has a problem, who was going to manage it, after analyzing I concluded the best will be an organization created by all global agents of changed, those who made a global change; organized by speciality (history, medicine, etc.) and by strategy, the fact to have an special group for each main strategy is critial, strategy is everything.
What actions do you propose?
I had created theotheretically the first plan to control the global warming, several years ago, currently I didn't see somebody is interested in this or anotehr plan.
But the first plan will be to structure the + project and the +association as explained in here
and here another details I had been adding lately.
Very respectfully, all the content is copyrighted, that means I want to participate to see it is correctly implemented, initially it was "open source" but after I saw there wasn't interest in making a plan I decided to copyright it.
Who will take these actions?
Initially a group that is really interested in control and anticipate consequence of global warming.
Where will these actions be taken?
Online, the concept of the +association is the flexibility.
What are other key benefits?
Optimize use of donation.
To have a plan to control global warming (included in paper)
To have a database of risk (included in paper)
What are the proposal’s costs?
no idea, it depends of what you want to get, because the +project is really big, and I don't think everything will be done initially.
I suppose 1 month to start, and 6 months to structure fully an +association.
In the document
there are several references :)
Thank you if you read it.
Juan Carlos Reyes Pacheco :)