Skip navigation
4comments
Share conversation: Share via:

Climate Colab

Aug 6, 2014
12:31

Member


1 |
Share via:
Novelty: 3/5 Novel for the proposed scale of action. Afforestation and agroforestry are not novel in general. Workability: 2/5 Unclear who is to do what, and when. The bottom line of 78.6 billion Euros/year is daunting, and unlikely to be fully funded. Is there an intermediate milestone that can demonstrate proof-of-concept, before the whole amount is required? Effectiveness: 3/5 Afforestation and agroforestry have strong long-term potentials for climate change mitigation. Thoroughness: 2/5 Proposal is lacking specifics regarding actors, actions, costs, etc. Presentation: 3/5 Generally well presented. An image of the proposed “Growboxx” would be helpful. --- The basic idea is good, but there is no responsible person or group to carry it out. No budget to show the steps to be taken to get the eventual 4.7 trillion Euros required. Overall not supportable.

Tavo Lopez

Aug 9, 2014
10:20

Member


2 |
Share via:
One of the biggest merits of this proposal is it's core technology. Having close to a 90% survival rate. No electricity No maintenance Only 60 liters per plant the first year ( then the plant survives by it self) The possibility to plant on desertified land. Easy to transport. Little training needed. Low cost per plant. Hope this wins so it gets more traction and changes the world

Climate Colab

Sep 3, 2014
12:25

Member


3 |
Share via:
- A proposal to use a proprietary "Growboxx" technology for large-scale reforestation and afforestion. Proposed by a company "Groasis" from The Netherlands (www.groasis.com/en). The company apparently has existing plans for near-term scale-up. - The technology is impressive, and the problem is an important one. There are various international programs taking on this issue of massive restoration, but they all lack sufficient funding to go to large scale. This proposal is appealing and persuasive, but falls short of "cleat" on the finance side. The proposal says it has "no costs" since it is profit making, but then seems to be asking for investments.

Cheryl Law

Sep 19, 2014
03:49

Member


4 |
Share via:
I plan on using them in the near future. I support this idea fully and wish everyone did. This is so needed for earth and all of its inhabitants. A win in my book. Everyone could and should be part of the solution. I might add there are many other proposals in the contest that sound great too.
ADD YOUR COMMENT
You must be logged into your account to post a comment.
Click on the box