Please find below the
Finalist Evaluation
Judges'' comments
Some of the proposal’s claims need addition support. There is indeed great potential for wind power generation, as the proposal identifies. The judges were reluctant to proceed due to the anticipated high costs of such a proposal at this very early stage concept. The submission could have benefited from additional editing and a stronger structure.
Semi-Finalist Evaluation
Judges'' ratings
| • | Novelty: | |
| • | Feasibility: | |
| • | Impact: | |
| • | Presentation: |
Judges'' comments
Comments from Judge 1:
Are you sure that the proposal will not have any structural problem? Usually the high buildings are designed to reduce the horizontal loads given by wind. Are you sure that we can increase the surface of the buildings to capture all these horizontal forces of the wind, at this high? The high-altitude winds are considered between the 500 to the 10.000 meters. Speaking about high of just 600 meters is not too low? Moreover, what does it mean without living requirements and without load requirements? Would be economically sustainable if these towers would be just for the production of energy?
1comment
Share conversation:
Share via:
 Darren Soong Nov 5, 2017 08:26  | Proposal creator Dear Judge, Thank you very much for reviewing and commenting on my proposal .We have been refining this technology project,our improvement include: 1. What actions do you propose? ----5. In response to the judges' questions. including: Wind tunnel simulation analysis of the project. 2. Timeline: Have a clear plan of work. 3. In addition, specify the country or countries where these actions will be taken -- There are changes. |
